OffshoreGuy
Diagnostic

Which situation are you in?

Four honest profiles. Each maps to the rail or rails on the Banking page that realistically serve it, with the jurisdiction posture and who declines it. None of these promises approval.

Situation 1

You run a crypto business or money-service operation

If your model is an exchange, a payment processor, money transmission, or anything a compliance desk reads as a money-service business, the major US rails decline you at underwriting. This is the hardest profile to bank, and no jurisdiction changes that fact. The realistic path is a Bitcoin-native rail that underwrites crypto categories on purpose, not a US business-banking rail that will classify you as an MSB and close the account.

Realistic rails
Xapo Bank (Bitcoin-native, underwrites crypto categories). Wise Business as a supplementary multi-currency rail where residency, not industry, is the blocker.
Entity posture
A US LLC does not fix an MSB classification. A Bitcoin-aligned entity paired with a Bitcoin-native rail is the honest fit. Confirm the rail accepts your specific activity before you file.
Who declines it
Relay and Mercury decline MSB-licensed businesses, crypto exchanges, and payment processors at underwriting.
Situation 2

You run non-MSB SaaS, e-commerce, or a holding company

If you were debanked for a residency reason or a prior account closure rather than your industry, and your business is not an MSB, you are the most bankable of the hard cases. A US-domiciled entity with a clean operating description and a US EIN onboards at the formation-friendly US rails. The lever is a credible operating business and truthful disclosures, not the entity on its own.

Realistic rails
Relay (formation-friendly US rail, non-MSB SaaS and e-commerce). Mercury for tech-flavored or DAO operations. Wise Business where your country of residence is the blocker.
Entity posture
A US-domiciled Wyoming or New Mexico LLC with a US EIN is the default. REPUTABLE jurisdiction, parked-entity framing avoided, real operating substance shown.
Who declines it
US rails still decline parked entities with no credible operation, controversial verticals, and any model that reads as money transmission.
Situation 3

You hold a Bitcoin or crypto treasury but do not transmit money

If your company holds Bitcoin or stablecoins as treasury but is not in the business of moving other people's money, you are not an MSB, and that distinction matters at underwriting. Bitcoin-treasury operators are bankable at more rails than crypto-business operators are. The common pattern is a Bitcoin-native rail for the BTC and USDT side plus a small US operating float elsewhere.

Realistic rails
Xapo Bank for the Bitcoin and USDT treasury. Relay or Statrys for the operating float, depending on whether the entity is US-domiciled or in the Asia corridor.
Entity posture
A Wyoming LLC banks the US float and a Bitcoin-native rail holds the treasury, or an Asia-corridor entity pairs with Statrys plus Xapo. Hold and transmit are different, and the entity description should make that clear.
Who declines it
A counterparty that requires a US-FDIC-insured primary will not accept a Gibraltar-licensed rail as the only relationship.
Situation 4

You run online services through an offshore-formed entity

If you formed a Belize, Seychelles, Nevis, or BVI entity, the major US business-banking rails do not onboard it, and we publish that on every one of those jurisdiction pages. This is not a marketing gap you can argue around, it is the rail's policy. The honest path is a Caribbean or Asia-corridor rail built for offshore-formed entities, or a Bitcoin-native rail if the model is Bitcoin-aligned.

Realistic rails
Caye International Bank for Belize, Seychelles, and Nevis entities. Statrys for the Hong Kong, Singapore, and BVI corridor. Xapo where the operation is Bitcoin-aligned.
Entity posture
An offshore IBC alone will not reach US banking. Pair it with a US-domiciled Wyoming or New Mexico LLC if you need a US rail, or bank the IBC through a Caribbean or Asia-corridor partner. GRAY-tier entities draw enhanced due diligence, and we never soften that.
Who declines it
Relay and Mercury serve US-domiciled entities only and decline Belize, Seychelles, Nevis, and BVI formations.
The named rails live on one page

We do not duplicate the rail cards here. The Banking page lists every rail in full, Relay, Mercury, Xapo, Caye, Statrys, and Wise, with the operator-grade fit narrative, the best-for and bad-for rows, and the disclosed referral fee. Read it there.

Open the Banking page
Common questions

Debanked banking, answered honestly

Is there a jurisdiction where banking is guaranteed for a debanked founder?
No. No jurisdiction, entity, or referral guarantees an account for a debanked founder, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you something. Every rail underwrites on its own terms and any of them can decline. What you can control is the posture: a clean compliance profile, a truthful activity description, and a rail chosen to fit your actual situation.
Can OffshoreGuy get me banked?
No. OffshoreGuy is not a bank and cannot approve you anywhere. We file the entity and rank the banking rails by fit on the Banking page, and we earn a disclosed referral fee if you open an account through us. The decision sits entirely with the rail, which underwrites you on its own terms.
Why did the US business-banking rails decline me?
Usually one of two reasons: your model reads as a money-service business, or the decline is about residency or a prior account closure rather than your industry. MSB-classified activity, exchanges, and payment processors are declined at underwriting by the US rails. If the blocker is residency, a US-domiciled entity with a US EIN often changes the answer, and a multi-currency rail like Wise is frequently the most-accepting fallback.
Does an offshore company give me access to US banking?
No. The major US business-banking rails serve US-domiciled entities only and do not onboard Belize, Seychelles, Nevis, or BVI formations. We publish that constraint on every one of those jurisdiction pages. If you need a US rail, pair the offshore entity with a US-domiciled Wyoming or New Mexico LLC, or bank the offshore entity through a Caribbean or Asia-corridor partner.
Does settling in Bitcoin let me avoid banking entirely?
Not entirely. Settling in Bitcoin and USDT through BitSettle, our Bitcoin and USDT settlement rail, lets you receive payment without depending on a business bank account, which removes a single point of failure. It is not a way around compliance: the exchange where you convert to fiat still runs KYC on you. It is a settlement path, not a banking license.
What actually improves my odds of getting banked?
A clean compliance posture, not the entity by itself. A credible operating business, an honest description of what you do, documented source of funds, and a rail chosen to fit your profile all move the odds in the right direction. Sanctions screening runs on every order we file, and choosing a REPUTABLE jurisdiction reads cleaner to a compliance desk than a GRAY one, though neither is a guarantee.